Evaluating the Effectiveness of Digital Learning Platforms in Enhancing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Among Undergraduate Students: A Literature Review

Abstract 

This paper presents a comprehensive literature review evaluating the effectiveness of digital learning platforms (DLPs) in enhancing both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among undergraduate students. The review synthesizes existing research on the current landscape of digital education, key motivational theories, and the empirical impact of specific platform features. Findings indicate that DLPs, through personalized learning, gamification, interactive elements, and collaborative tools, significantly influence intrinsic motivation by fostering autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Concurrently, features such as flexibility, micro-credentials, and structured feedback mechanisms effectively leverage extrinsic motivation by providing clear goal pathways and tangible rewards. However, the successful integration and sustained impact of these platforms are moderated by critical factors including digital literacy, equitable access, technical stability, and effective teacher training. The analysis underscores the potential of DLPs to transform educational experiences while also highlighting the imperative for thoughtful design and systemic support to overcome existing challenges.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background and Evolution of Digital Learning in Higher Education

The landscape of higher education has undergone a profound transformation with the accelerating integration of digital learning platforms (DLPs). This trend has been particularly amplified by global shifts and rapid technological advancements, positioning virtual training and e-learning as fundamental components of modern educational delivery (Dhawan, 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has acted as a catalyst for this transformation, forcing higher education institutions worldwide to rapidly adopt digital learning systems and highlighting the critical importance of digital readiness in educational contexts (Waller, 2023; Alsoud & Harasis, 2021). Research indicates that the emergency transition to digitally-based education during 2020-2021 worldwide was characterized as diverse and unprepared, yet ultimately successful in maintaining educational continuity (Alsoud & Harasis, 2021).

These platforms serve as comprehensive online systems, providing flexible access to a diverse array of educational resources and tools. They empower learners to engage with course content, participate in online discussions, submit assignments, and complete assessments at their convenience, transcending traditional temporal and spatial constraints (Dhawan, 2020).  The global digital transformation spending in education is projected to more than double from nearly half a trillion US dollars in 2020 to over one trillion by 2025, reflecting the substantial investment in educational technology infrastructure (Waller, 2023).

Modern digital learning platforms are characterized by sophisticated functionalities that extend far beyond basic content delivery. They incorporate advanced features such as intuitive drag-and-drop content designers, detailed skills matrices, and intelligent AI assistants capable of transcribing video lessons and facilitating communication. Furthermore, many platforms offer multi-language support, robust security protocols, and comprehensive progress tracking capabilities. Examples of such platforms include Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle, iSpring Learn, SkyPrep, Absorb LMS, and Litmos, each contributing unique capabilities to the digital learning ecosystem (Swerzenski, 2021; Bundy, 2022). 

The evolution of these platforms reveals that their diverse and advanced features, such as AI integration, customization options, collaborative tools, and tracking capabilities, are not merely functional enhancements. Instead, they are inherently designed to address specific psychological needs that underpin motivation. For instance, the ability to customize one’s learning environment or choose learning paths supports a sense of autonomy, while detailed progress tracking and immediate feedback mechanisms can reinforce a learner’s sense of competence. Moreover, varied communication tools and discussion forums foster a sense of relatedness among peers and instructors (Salikhova et al., 2020). This inherent alignment, whether explicit or implicit in the design process, suggests that technological development in digital learning platforms is increasingly converging with principles of motivational psychology, aiming to create more engaging and effective learning experiences. 

1.2. The Critical Role of Student Motivation in Higher Education

Student motivation stands as a critical determinant of academic achievement and overall well-being within higher education settings. Research consistently demonstrates that motivational factors are among “the strongest predictors of academic performance” in higher education, with motivated students showing a greater propensity to engage deeply with course material, exhibit increased persistence when confronted with academic challenges, and ultimately achieve superior academic outcomes (Walker et al., 2024; Devkota & Giri, 2020). Studies indicate that motivation can account for a significant portion of the variance in student achievement, with more motivated students performing at higher levels compared to their less motivated peers (Richardson et al., 2012). 

The importance of motivation becomes particularly pronounced in digital learning environments, where traditional forms of external structure and social interaction may be diminished. Students in online learning contexts often face unique challenges, including feelings of isolation, technological barriers, and the need for greater self-regulation (Lopez & Tadros, 2023). Research reveals that both intrinsic motivation (engagement for inherent satisfaction) and well-internalized extrinsic motivation (identified and integrated regulation) predict positive educational outcomes in digital settings (Ryan & Deci, 2020). 

Beyond mere task completion or grade attainment, motivation serves as a fundamental driver for deeper learning, critical thinking, problem-solving, and the development of essential 21st-century skills. When students are genuinely motivated, they are more likely to engage in critical thinking, creatively solve problems, and explore subjects more deeply, asking probing questions and developing innovative solutions (Lopez & Tadros, 2023). This highlights that the quality of engagement, propelled by intrinsic motivation, is paramount for achieving meaningful educational outcomes that extend beyond rote memorization or superficial understanding.

Furthermore, intrinsic motivation is particularly crucial for fostering autonomous, self-directed learners who cultivate lifelong learning habits, pursuing knowledge for its inherent satisfaction rather than external pressures. Research demonstrates that students with higher intrinsic motivation drivers are more likely to succeed in enabling education and demonstrate greater academic persistence (Weiler & Murad, 2022). This enduring drive is vital for students to adapt and thrive in an ever-evolving world, making motivation a cornerstone of effective education. 

1.3. Problem Statement and Research Question

Despite the widespread and accelerating adoption of digital learning technologies across higher education institutions, a notable gap persists in the empirical literature specifically focused on how these platforms distinctly affect student motivation as a measurable outcome. While research has examined various aspects of digital learning platforms, including their technological capabilities, usability, and general educational effectiveness, a comprehensive understanding of their precise influence on the nuanced aspects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation remains underexplored (Clark et al., 2025). 

Existing research frequently highlights significant challenges in maintaining student motivation and engagement within online learning environments, often leading to struggles with coursework, feelings of isolation, and overall disengagement (Blackmon & Major, 2012; Rasheed et al., 2020). Studies consistently report that students in online learning environments exhibit lower intrinsic and extrinsic motivation compared to their face-to-face counterparts, with many experiencing decreased interest and less valuing of their courses (Walket et al., 2024). The absence of physical co-presence can diminish human interaction, a key component for fostering relatedness, which is vital for motivation. 

Several specific research gaps have been identified in the current literature. First, while numerous studies examine the general impact of digital learning platforms on academic performance, few investigate the specific mechanisms through which these platforms influence different types of motivation (intrinsic versus extrinsic) among undergraduate students. Second, there is limited research on how specific features of digital learning platforms – such as gamification elements, personalized learning paths, AI-driven recommendations, and collaborative tools – differentially affect motivational outcomes (Chiu et al., 2023). Third, the relationship between basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) and digital learning platform design remains insufficiently explored in the context of undergraduate education.

Furthermore, most existing studies focus on emergency remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic rather than examining the sustained impact of purposefully designed digital learning environments on student motivation (Abdulrahim & Mabrouk, 2020). This context underscores a critical need to synthesize current research findings to identify the specific features, design principles, and pedagogical approaches within digital learning platforms that either effectively enhance or inadvertently hinder both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among undergraduate students.

The research gap is particularly significant given the rapid evolution of digital learning technologies and the increasing integration of artificial intelligence, adaptive learning systems, and personalized educational experiences in higher education. Understanding how these technological innovations specifically impact student motivation is crucial for optimizing future digital learning experiences and ensuring that the substantial investments in educational technology translate into meaningful improvements in student engagement and academic success.

Bridging this gap between technological capabilities and actual motivational outcomes is essential for informing evidence-based design decisions, pedagogical strategies, and institutional policies that can maximize the potential of digital learning platforms to enhance undergraduate student motivation and academic achievement. 

1.4. Research Questions

• How effective are digital platforms in enhancing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among undergraduate students in higher education?
• What key factors or features of digital learning platforms are associated with increased student motivation?
• What insights can be drawn from existing research regarding the impact of digital learning platforms on student motivation across different learning environments (e.g., online, hybrid)?

1.5. Research Objectives

• To evaluate the overall effectiveness of digital learning platforms in supporting both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among undergraduate students.
• To identify motivational factors linked to the use of digital learning platforms in existing peer-reviewed literature.
• To synthesize and critically assess current research findings on student motivation in digital learning contexts at the undergraduate level.

1.6. Significance of the Study

This review offers substantial contributions across theoretical, practical, and policy domains. Theoretically, it will enrich the existing body of knowledge by synthesizing contemporary research on motivation within digital learning environments. This synthesis has the potential to refine the application of established motivational theories, such as Self-Determination Theory and Keller’s ARCS Model, within the rapidly evolving technological contexts of higher education. By identifying specific ways in which digital platforms interact with motivational constructs, the study can highlight areas where theoretical understanding requires further development or adaptation to adequately capture the complexities of modern learning.

From a practical standpoint, the findings will provide evidence-based recommendations directly applicable to higher education educators, instructional designers, and digital learning platforms developers. These recommendations will aim to guide the creation and implementation of more motivating and effective digital learning experiences. Ultimately, this can lead to tangible improvements in student engagement, persistence, and academic success, as practitioners will have clearer guidance on how to leverage technology to foster desired motivational states.

Furthermore, the insights derived from this comprehensive review can significantly inform institutional policies concerning the strategic adoption, integration, and continuous improvement of digital learning technologies. By understanding which aspects of DLPs are most effective for motivation, institutions can make more informed decisions regarding resource allocation, curriculum design, and faculty training. This, in turn, can foster the development of supportive learning environments that prioritize student motivational well-being and contribute to higher academic retention rates.

2. Conceptual Framework

2.1. Definition of Key Terms

2.1.1 Digital Learning Platforms (DLPs)

Digital learning platforms (DLPs), often used interchangeably with terms like learning management systems (LMS), virtual learning environments (VLEs), or e-learning systems, are comprehensive online infrastructures designed to deliver, manage, and track educational content and interactions (El-Sabagh, 2021). These systems typically support a range of instructional functions, including content delivery, communication, collaboration, assessment, and feedback (Al-Fraihat et al., 2020; Ifentgaler & Yau, 2020). A defining characteristic of these platforms is their inherent flexibility, which allows learners to access materials and engage in learning activities at their convenience, thereby transcending traditional geographical and temporal barriers (Dziuban et al., 2018). 

The core functionalities of DLPs enable students to access course content, participate in asynchronous or synchronous discussions, submit assignments, and complete assessments (Almaiah et al., 2020). Modern platforms have evolved to integrate an array of advanced features, including intuitive content creation tools, comprehensive progress-tracking systems, multi-language support, and robust security measures, reflecting their role as comprehensive, integrated digital educational ecosystems (Kasabova et al., 2023; Gorshenin, 2018). Many also incorporate diverse communication and collaboration tools (e.g., forums, wikis, video conferencing) to foster interaction among learners and instructors. Prominent examples in the market include Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle, and Google Classroom, with some platforms beginning to feature AI assistants for personalized feedback, content summarization, or custom interfaces to enhance the learning experience. The emphasis on user-friendly interfaces and seamless processes is a critical prerequisite for their motivational effectiveness. A platform that is difficult to navigate or introduces significant technical hurdles can generate frustration and extraneous cognitive load, which can actively demotivate students before they even engage with the learning material. Therefore, foundational usability and accessibility are not merely desirable characteristics but are essential for preventing a negative motivational impact, forming the crucial underlying layer upon which more sophisticated motivational design elements can be built (Al-Fraihat et al., 2020). 

2.1.2. Intrinsic Motivation in Education

Intrinsic motivation is the internal drive that propels individuals to engage in an activity for the inherent satisfaction, curiosity, or enjoyment it provides, rather than for some separable external reward or consequences (Ryan & Deci, 2017). It originates from a genuine psychological need to explore, learn, and achieve mastery over new concepts and skills.

When students are intrinsically motivated, they exhibit a deeper level of engagement with learning material, which manifests as increased persistence in the face of challenges, enhanced creativity, and improved conceptual understanding and knowledge retention (Cerasoli et al., 2014; Ryan & Deci, 2020). This form of motivation is considered paramount for cultivating self-regulated learning and nurturing lifelong learners who pursue knowledge for its own sake (Qureshi et al., 2024). Key drivers of intrinsic motivation, as outlined in Self-Determination Theory, include the satisfaction of the basic psychological needs for autonomy (a sense of choice and control), competence (a feeling of effectiveness and mastery), and relatedness (a sense of belonging and connection) (Ryan & Deci, 2017). These internal drivers encourage learners to take initiative, remain engaged, and find genuine value and enjoyment in their educational experiences.

2.1.3. Extrinsic Motivation in Education

Extrinsic motivation refers to a behavioral drive stimulated by external rewards or pressures, where the primary focus is on achieving an outcome that is separable from the activity itself (Ryan & Deci, 2020). These external contingencies can manifest as tangible incentives, such as grades, points, or certificates, or as intangible forms of recognition, including praise, social approval, or the avoidance of punishment (Deci et al, 2017). 

While extrinsic motivators can be effective in initiating action, particularly when intrinsic interest is initially low or for encouraging completion of routine tasks, their focus remains on the end result rather than the learning process (Cerasoli et al., 2014). A significant concern with the overuse of tangible extrinsic rewards is the “overjustification effect”, a phenomenon where providing an external incentive for an activity that was already intrinsically rewarding can undermine a person’s initial interest (Deci et al., 1999). Consequently, students might engage with tasks superficially, performing them only to obtain the reward, which can transform learning from a meaningful pursuit into a mere transaction, potentially hindering deep engagement and long-term retention (Ryan & Deci, 2017). However, not all extrinsic motivation is detrimental, as will be explored in Self-Determination Theory, it can be internalized to varying degrees, becoming more self-determined and beneficial for learning (Ryan & Deci, 2020).

2.1.4. Undergraduate Students in Higher Education

Undergraduate students are individuals enrolled in a university or college program pursuing a bachelor’s degree. This demographic represents a crucial phase of academic and personal development characterized by evolving cognitive abilities, increasing demand for self-reliance, and the formation of professional aspirations (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005). Their motivational profiles are particularly significant in higher education due to the greater academic autonomy and self-directed learning expected within university curricula (Mega et al., 2014). Effective learning at this level requires students to become proficient self-regulators, capable of setting goals, managing their time, and persisting through complex academic challenges (Zimmerman & Schunk, 2001). The large-scale integration of digital learning platforms directly impacts their motivational experiences, necessitating pedagogical approaches and platform designs that cater to their unique developmental needs and support their journey toward becoming autonomous learners (Hartnett, 2016).   

2.2. Motivation Theories in Educational Contexts

2.2.1. Self-Determination Theory (SDT)

Self-Determination Theory (SDT), developed by Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan, is a comprehensive macro-theory of human motivation and personality (Ryan & Deci, 2017). It posits that all individuals possess three innate and universal psychological needs: Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness. The satisfaction of these needs is considered essential for optimal psychological growth, well-being, and the development of intrinsic motivation, as well as the healthy internalization of extrinsic motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2020).

• Autonomy refers to the need to experience choice and self-initiation in one’s actions, feeling that behavior is volitional rather than controlled by external forces (Ryan & Deci, 2017). In a DLP, autonomy can be supported by offering choices in assignment topics, learning paths, or modes of expression (e.g., text vs. video submission).
• Competence involves the need to feel effective and masterful in one’s environment. This is fostered by understanding how to achieve desired outcomes and experiencing a sense of accomplishment (Hartnett, 2016). DLPs can support competence through clear learning objectives, structured feedback, and tasks that are optimally challenging. 
• Relatedness pertains to the need to feel connected to others, to experience belongingness, and to develop secure interpersonal relationships (Ryan & Deci, 2017). This can be facilitated on DLPs through collaborative projects, supportive discussion forums, and meaningful instructor-student interactions (Chiu, 2021). 

SDT distinguishes between motivation types along a continuum of internalization, from controlled to autonomous. Intrinsic motivation is the prototype of autonomous behavior. Extrinsic motivation is categorized into four subtypes: external regulation (behavior controlled by rewards/punishments), introjected regulation (internal pressures like guilt), identified regulation (valuing a goal and accepting its regulation), and integrated regulation (regulations are fully assimilated into one’s sense of self) (Ryan & Deci, 2020).

SDT posits that social contexts supporting the three basic needs, such as autonomy-supportive teaching within a DLP, promote more self-determined forms of motivation, leading to better educational outcomes like deeper engagement and persistence (Chiu, 2021). This framework is crucial for evaluating DLPs beyond superficial metrics (e.g., login counts). It allows for an assessment of the quality of motivation fostered, differentiating between platforms that merely drive behavior through external controls (e.g., points for clicking) and those that support students’ needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, thereby fostering more valuable, internalized forms of motivation (Hartnett, 2016). 

2.2.2. ARCS Model of Motivational Design: Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction

Developed by John M. Keller, the ARCS Model is a systematic instructional design framework focused on creating and sustaining learner motivation (Keller, 2010). The model is particularly relevant for designing online and digital learning environments where learner motivation can be challenging to maintain (Uçar & Kumtepe, 2020). ARCS is composed of four essential components:

• Attention: Capturing and maintaining learner interest. Strategies include perceptual arousal (e.g., using novelty, humor, or surprise), inquiry arousal (e.g., posing challenging questions or problems), and variability in instructional methods (Keller, 2010).
• Relevance: Ensuring the learning content is perceived as meaningful and connected to learners’ experiences, interests, and goals. Strategies involve linking content to present worth or future usefulness and using familiar analogies or role models (Li & Keller, 2018).
• Confidence: Fostering learners’ belief in their ability to succeed. This is achieved by communicating clear objectives, providing opportunities for early success on challenging tasks, offering constructive feedback, and giving learners a sense of control over their learning and assessment (Keller, 2010).
• Satisfaction: Ensuring learners feel rewarded for their efforts. This involves providing opportunities to apply new skills in a meaningful way (intrinsic reinforcement) and offering appropriate extrinsic rewards like praise or recognition that are consistent with standards (Li & Keller, 2018). 

The ARCS model provides a practical, actionable framework for designing motivational elements into DLPs (Uçar & Kumtepe, 2020). While SDT provides the theoretical “why” of motivation by identifying fundamental psychological needs, the ARCS model offers the practical “how” through specific design strategies. For instance, an ARCS-based design might use a captivating introductory video (Attention), connect the topic to future career goals (Relevance), provide a practice quiz with immediate feedback (Confidence), and award a badge upon module completion (Satisfaction). This direct translation of theory to practice makes ARCS an invaluable tool for evaluating and improving the motivational affordances of digital learning platforms.

Table 1. Summary of Motivational Theories and Their Application to Digital Learning

2.3. Relationship between Motivation and Digital Learning

The relationship between motivation and digital learning is inherently interconnected and dynamic, extending beyond a simple cause-and-effect interaction. Digital learning platforms are not merely neutral conduits for content; they are complex socio-technical environments whose architecture, pedagogical design, and embedded features can significantly facilitate or hinder motivational processes (Hartnett, 2016).

Digital platforms possess unique affordances that can directly support the basic psychological needs that foster student motivation. For instance, their capacity to provide personalized and interactive learning experiences can enhance feelings of autonomy and competence. Features allowing for self-paced learning, choice in assignment topics, and adaptive, non-judgmental feedback empower students, aligning directly with the core tenets of Self-Determination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 2017). However, the rapid shift to digital learning, particularly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, exposed significant motivational challenges. This transition often made it difficult for students to stay engaged with content, leading to widespread reports of disengagement and academic struggles (Adedoyin & Soykan, 2020). Challenges such as “Zoom fatigue”, defined as the cognitive and emotional exhaustion from constant video conferencing, along with the “attention economy,” where digital distractions abound, have been identified as key contributors to situational disinterest and student disengagement (Rajan et al., 2024). 

Crucially, the effectiveness of DLPs in enhancing motivation is not solely dependent on the platform’s design; it is also profoundly influenced by students’ pre-existing motivational profiles and external circumstances. A student’s academic self-efficacy – their belief in their own ability to succeed in academic tasks – is a robust predictor of their success and persistence in online learning environments (Honicke & Broadbent, 2016). Furthermore, external stressors (often referred to as “lifeload”, encompassing economic, employment, family, social, or health pressure) play a crucial role in how students interact with, perceive, and ultimately benefit from digital learning environments (Rajan et al., 2024). For example, students with higher self-efficacy tend to adapt more easily to the flexibility offered by online learning and feel the benefits more strongly, while those with lower self-efficacy may prefer highly structured face-to-face learning and experience reduced motivation in less controlled digital settings (Rajan et al., 2024). This complex interplay signifies that a one-size-fits-all motivational design for DLPs may not be universally effective. Instead, a more adaptive and personalized approach is often required, acknowledging that motivation in digital learning is a product of both thoughtful design and the individual characteristics and external contexts of the learners.

3. Methodology

3.1. Type of Research: Structured Literature Review (Qualitative Research Method)

This study employs a structured literature review, a systematic and rigorous approach designed to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant research on a specific topic. This method is chosen to ensure comprehensiveness in coverage and to minimize potential bias in the selection of studies. While the initial search and selection process adheres to a structured protocol, the subsequent synthesis of the identified findings primarily involves a qualitative approach. This qualitative synthesis allows for an in-depth analysis of emergent themes, patterns, contradictions, and potential causal relationships within the literature. Such an approach provides rich, nuanced insights into the complex interplay between digital learning platforms and student motivation, moving beyond mere aggregation of quantitative data to interpret the underlying dynamics.

3.2. Research Design: A Qualitative Synthesis of Peer-Reviewed Studies

The research design for this study focuses on a qualitative synthesis of peer-reviewed studies. This approach is specifically chosen to interpret the diverse and often complex findings from the selected literature. A qualitative synthesis is particularly suitable for exploring intricate phenomena such as student motivation, where context, individual experiences, and nuanced interpretations are crucial for a comprehensive understanding. This design enables the review to move beyond simply summarizing individual study results, instead aiming to construct a coherent, interpretive understanding of how digital learning platforms influence both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among undergraduate students. It allows for the identification of overarching themes and theoretical implications that might not be apparent from isolated studies. 

3.3. Inclusion Criteria 

To ensure the relevance and quality of the literature included in this review, the following stringent inclusion criteria were applied:

• Publication Date: Studies must have been published between 2013 and 2024. This timeframe ensures that the review captures contemporary research on digital learning technologies, which are rapidly evolving.
• Source Type: Only peer-reviewed academic journals were considered. This criterion ensures the scholarly rigor, validity, and quality of the included literature. 
• Motivational Focus: Studies were required to explicitly focus on intrinsic motivation and/or extrinsic motivation as primary variables or measured outcomes. This specificity ensures direct relevance to the central research questions.
• Educational Setting: Research must have been conducted specifically within higher education settings, targeting undergraduate students. This focus maintains direct relevance to the study’s defined scope and target population.
• Language: Articles written exclusively in English were included to ensure accessibility for the reviewers and consistency in interpretation.

3.4. Exclusion Criteria

To maintain the focus and academic integrity of the review, the following exclusion criteria were applied:

• Educational Level: Research exclusively focused on K-12 education (primary and secondary schooling) or corporate training was excluded. Motivational dynamics, learning environments, and platform usage in these contexts can differ significantly from those in higher education.
• Motivational Scope: Studies that examined general concepts such as student engagement or academic performance without explicitly analyzing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as distinct constructs were excluded. The review specifically targets the nuanced forms of motivation.
• Source Type: Non-peer-reviewed sources, including blogs, opinion pieces, conference abstracts without accompanying full papers, dissertations not formally published in peer-reviewed journals, or book chapters, were excluded to maintain the academic rigor and quality of the synthesized evidence. 

3.5. Databases Used 

A systematic search strategy was employed across multiple databases to ensure broad and comprehensive coverage of relevant literature. The following databases were utilized:

• Google Scholar
• ERIC (Education Resources Information Center)
• JSTOR
• Scopus
• Web of Science

3.6. Search Strategy and Keywords

A systematic search strategy was meticulously developed and applied across the identified databases. This involved using a combination of keywords and phrases, carefully employing Boolean operators (AND, OR) to refine search results and maximize the retrieval of relevant studies. The primary keyword combinations and phrases utilized included:

• “students motivation AND digital learning platforms”
• “intrinsic AND extrinsic motivation AND online education”
• “motivation in higher education AND e-learning”
• “effectiveness of digital platforms AND university students”

These keywords were strategically combined to capture studies that specifically addressed the effectiveness of digital learning platforms in influencing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among undergraduate students in higher education contexts. The search was further refined by applying the specified publication date range (2013-2024) and filtering for peer-reviewed articles, where possible, within each database’s functionalities. 

4. Findings and Analysis

4.1. Impact on Intrinsic Motivation

Digital learning platforms demonstrate significant potential to enhance intrinsic motivation among undergraduate students, primarily through satisfying the three basic psychological needs identified by Self-Determination Theory: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Research consistently shows that these psychological needs are fundamental predictors of autonomous motivation in educational contexts (Wang et al., 2019). 

When students perceive choice and control over their learning process, their sense of autonomy is strengthened. Digital learning platforms support autonomy through features such as personalized learning paths, flexible deadlines, and options for selecting learning activities or topics. Studies indicate that personalized learning principles implemented in online courses significantly support students’ psychological need satisfaction, particularly autonomy and competence, thereby fostering intrinsic motivation (Alamri et al., 2020; Yuerong et al., 2024). This personalized approach, sometimes enhanced by AI-powered tools for tailored communication and recommendations, creates more engaging and relevant environments for students, which can enhance their intrinsic drive (Chiu et al., 2023).

The feeling of mastery and effectiveness, or competence, proves crucial for intrinsic motivation. Digital learning platforms contribute to competence satisfaction by providing clear learning objectives, opportunities for incremental learning with increasing difficulty, and immediate, constructive feedback (Abildina et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2025). Educational software can adapt to a student’s performance, increasing difficulty as they succeed and offering prompts when they hesitate, thereby building confidence and reinforcing competence. Furthermore, teacher support within digital environments plays a significant role in enhancing intrinsic motivation by positively influencing students’ perceived competence and relatedness (An et al., 2022; Chiu et al., 2023). When teachers provide guidance, structure, and positive feedback, students are more likely to feel capable and connected, leading to greater intrinsic motivation and engagement in online learning.

Relatedness, the need to feel connected to others, can be fostered through collaborative tools and interactive features within digital learning platforms. Discussion forums, breakout rooms, and group project functionalities facilitate student-to-student and student-to-teacher interactions, which are confirmed to be positively related to learning engagement and satisfaction (Yuerong et al., 2024). Creating collaborative spaces and promoting emotional communication between teachers and students can enhance a sense of belonging, which is strongly linked to higher intrinsic motivation (An et al., 2022; Dong et al., 2024). 

However, the impact on intrinsic motivation faces significant challenges. Online learning environments have been consistently reported to make it difficult for students to stay motivated and engaged, often leading to struggles with coursework. Factors such as “Zoom fatigue” (mental and physical exhaustion from continuous online classes), cognitive overload, and the “attention economy” (where teachers compete for student attention amidst digital distractions) can contribute to situational disinterest and reduce intrinsic drive (Rajan et al., 2024). The isolation often experienced in digital settings can also diminish a student’s sense of belonging, which in turn negatively affects intrinsic motivation. This underscores that while DLPs offer features that can support intrinsic motivation, their effective implementation requires careful pedagogical design to mitigate the inherent challenges of the digital environment.

4.2. Impact on Extrinsic Motivation

Digital learning platforms effectively leverage extrinsic motivation through various features and activities that offer external rewards or consequences. These include traditional incentives such as grades, but also digital badges, points, and leaderboards, often integrated through gamification strategies (López-Navarro et al., 2023; Chon et al., 2024). Gamification, in particular, has been shown to improve student motivation and engagement by incorporating game elements such as clear rules, objectives, point systems, missions, and rewards (Chon et al., 2024; Ratinho & Martins, 2023). Digital badges serve as motivational tools by signifying milestones or achievements, encouraging learners to pursue higher goals (Balci et al., 2022). 

Research demonstrates that gamification elements significantly enhance extrinsic motivation. A counterbalanced study by López-Navarro et al. found that gamification delivered through ICT increases extrinsic motivation to learn in undergraduate students, with effects that persist over time even after gamification implementation ceases. Similarly, studies show that students’ self-efficacy and enjoyment in gamified environments significantly influence academic engagement, with gamification serving as a bridge between extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation (Chon et al., 2024; Ratinho & Martins, 2023).

However, the role of extrinsic motivation in digital learning is complex and nuanced. While external rewards can be effective for initiating action or motivating students who have low intrinsic interest, there is significant concern regarding the “overjustification effect”. This effect suggests that excessive reliance on external rewards can undermine a student’s inherent intrinsic motivation for an activity they previously enjoyed (Anderman, 2023). If extrinsic rewards become the primary motivator, students might engage with material superficially, focusing solely on obtaining rewards rather than on deep understanding or genuine learning. (Jose et al., 2024). This can transform learning into an obligation rather than a self-driven pursuit. 

Research indicates that extrinsic motivation, particularly identified regulation (where students value and accept the behavior’s importance), can play a crucial role in online learning environments, sometimes even more so than intrinsic motivation (Zhou & Zhang, 2023). This suggests that for some undergraduate students, external stimuli such as course assignments, requirements, and final grades are significant drivers. However, studies on specific online activities, such as topic-based discussions with grading requirements, have sometimes failed to show a significant impact on extrinsic motivation, especially if participation is too easy or the reward weight is too low (Zhou & Zhang, 2023). This indicates that the design and weighting of extrinsic motivators within digital learning platforms are critical for their effectiveness. If external rewards are perceived as controlling or too easily attained, they may not significantly influence motivation or engagement. 

Furthermore, the effectiveness of extrinsic motivators varies depending on how they align with psychological needs. When external rewards are designed to complement intrinsic goals, such as mastering a skill or engaging in meaningful challenges, they can foster deeper and more sustained interest in learning (Jose et al., 2024). For example, gamification elements that encourage personal goal setting, offer constructive feedback, and support self-paced progress can align with internal drives, promoting both engagement and authentic understanding. This balance is crucial to prevent extrinsic motivation from simply leading to perfunctory engagement without fostering lasting interest or psychologically meaningful cognitive work (Jose et al., 2024).

4.3. Comparative Observations

The impact of digital learning platforms on student motivation varies significantly across different learning environments, including fully online, hybrid, and traditional face-to-face (f2f) settings. The transition to online learning, particularly during and after the global pandemic, has profoundly affected how learners engage and their motivational states (Rajan et al., 2024).

Online learning environments consistently present unique challenges that make it difficult for students to stay motivated and engaged with their learning content (Chiu, 2021). Students in online settings often experience feelings of isolation, anxiety, and uncertainty, which can lead to disengagement (Rajan et al., 2024). The absence of physical co-presence can diminish human interaction, a key component for fostering relatedness, which is vital for motivation (Al-Hail et al., 2024). This reduced contact with peers and educators can exacerbate a student’s lack of belonging, leading to diminished motivation (Rajan et al., 2024). Furthermore, factors such as “Zoom fatigue”, cognitive overload from constant video calls, and the pervasive “attention economy” where students are constantly exposed to digital distractions, contribute to a decline in situational interest and overall engagement in online courses (Rajan et al., 2024; Basch et al., 2025). 

Research consistently shows that students learning online exhibit lower intrinsic and extrinsic motivation compared to their face-to-face counterparts. A longitudinal study found that students’ intrinsic motivation declined more steeply in online semesters compared to regular face-to-face semesters (Bosch & Spinath, 2023). Students also report less interest and less valuing of their course in online settings (Walker et al., 2024). This suggests that online students might be more vulnerable to poorer academic outcomes if the relationship between motivation and academic performance is as strong in online courses as it is in face-to-face courses (Walker et al., 2024). 

In contrast, traditional face-to-face learning environments often provide a more structured and facilitated process, which some students, particularly those with lower self-efficacy, may prefer (Kemp, 2014; Bright & Vogler, 2024). While online learning offers flexibility, which is recognized as a positive outcome for some, its benefits are most strongly felt by participants who possess higher self-efficacy and are already intrinsically motivated (Bright & Vogler, 2024). Students with lower self-efficacy may struggle to adapt to the independent nature of online learning, leading to reduced motivation and incentive to engage.

Hybrid learning environments, which combine elements of both online and face-to-face instruction, present a unique motivational dynamic. Research suggests that blended learning can have a more positive impact on academic performance than purely face-to-face or online learning, with learners often holding more positive attitudes towards it (Tong et al., 2022; Syan et al., 2021). In blended contexts, both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation can positively correlate with learning performance, with intrinsic motivation often showing a stronger link (Liu et al., 2024; Peng & Fu, 2021). A study of undergraduate nursing students found that blended learning significantly improved both academic success and motivation compared to face-to-face or social media learning approaches (Syan et al., 2021). However, even in blended settings, the direct effect of extrinsic motivation on academic performance can sometimes be negative, potentially due to adult learners feeling resentment towards excessive external pressure (Liu et al., 2024). This highlights the importance of cultivating intrinsic learning motivation while maintaining an appropriate level of external motivation in blended practices.

Meta-analytic evidence reveals that the predictive power of motivation on academic performance might be lower in online and blended learning settings compared to face-to-face environments (Walker et al., 2024). This suggests that other factors, such as self-regulated learning, technology proficiency, or external “lifeload” pressures, may play a more significant role in determining success in digital learning contexts (Hashmi et al., 2025; Rajan et al., 2024). The highest correlation found in online learning was mastery avoidance goals (r = 0.22), while academic self-efficacy (r = 0.19) was substantially lower than face-to-face findings (Walker et al., 2024). This complex interplay between learning environment, platform features, and individual student characteristics necessitates a nuanced understanding of motivational dynamics in digital contexts. 

5. Discussion

5.1. Interpretation of Findings

Digital learning platforms (DLPs) have the potential to foster intrinsic motivation by meeting learners’ needs for autonomy and competence. For example, Salikhova et al. (2021) found that adult students often felt online courses provided ample autonomy and competence support, even as they struggled to satisfy their relatedness needs. Similarly, Leek and Rojek (2022) report that digital international courses emphasizing self-directed learning and innovative assessments made students “more autonomous in their learning” and supported motivation and independence. These findings suggest that features like personalized learning paths, adaptive feedback, and collaborative tools can empower students and give them a sense of mastery when thoughtfully implemented. However, simply adding technology is not enough – platform design and pedagogy must deliberately structure activities, guide feedback, and allow genuine choice. For instance, Farrell and Brunton (2020) show that effective online courses combine clear objectives and engaging content so that students feel in control of their learning; when courses lack this structure, student engagement suffers. 

The role of extrinsic motivation in digital environments is equally complex. While digital learning platforms can effectively utilize external rewards like grades, badges, and points to initiate engagement and guide behavior, particularly through gamification, there is a persistent concern about the “overjustification effect” (López-Navarro et al., 2023; Chon et al., 2024). This phenomenon highlights that excessive or poorly designed external rewards can inadvertently undermine a student’s intrinsic desire to learn, leading to superficial engagement where the focus shifts from genuine understanding to merely obtaining the reward (Deci et al., 1999; Dahlstrøm, 2017). Research indicates that the overjustification effect is particularly pronounced when external rewards are given for mere completion rather than performance quality, and when rewards are perceived as controlling rather than informational (Deci et al., 2017; Nicholson, 2012). This suggests that the type and application of extrinsic motivators within digital learning platforms are crucial. Extrinsic motivators are most beneficial when they align with and eventually support intrinsic goals, such as skill mastery of personal growth, rather than becoming the sole reason for engagement (Dahlstrøm, 2017; López-Navarro et al., 2023).

A critical observation is that the relationship between motivation and digital learning is inherently bidirectional and dynamic. While digital learning platforms can be designed to enhance motivation, students’ pre-existing motivational profiles, including their self-efficacy and their inclination towards intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation, significantly influence how they interact with and benefit from these platforms (Ali, 2021; Güçlü et al., 2024). External stressors, often referred to as “lifeload”, also play a substantial role, impacting a student’s capacity to engage with digital learning regardless of platform design (Farrell & Brunton, 2020). This complex interplay underscores that a one-size-fits-all motivational design for digital learning platforms is unlikely to be universally effective, necessitating adaptive and personalized approaches that consider the individual learner’s context and needs (Chiu et al., 2023).

Finally, usability and accessibility are foundational. If a platform is hard to navigate or unreliable, students become frustrated before any motivational features can take effect. Odabaş and Kahramanoğlu (2023) report that Turkish students’ online homework system generally boosted self-efficacy and a sense of competence, but frequent “systemic problems” (technical glitches or confusing interfaces) directly demotivated them. Likewise, a Saudi study found medical students appreciated the flexibility and time-saving of online classes, yet they also highlighted persistent technical and design challenges. These examples show that well-intentioned digital tasks can backfire if the user experience is poor. In summary, an intuitive, reliable platform is a prerequisite: only then can higher-level motivational strategies (personalization, gamification, community-building) take root. 

5.2. Theoretical Implications

The findings of this review offer several implications for the application and refinement of established motivational theories within digital learning contexts. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) emerges as a robust framework, providing a critical diagnostic lens for evaluating the quality of motivation fostered by digital learning platforms (Salikhova et al., 2020; Chiu et al., 2023). The ability of SDT to differentiate between various types of extrinsic motivation, from externally regulated to integrated, allows for a more nuanced assessment of whether a platform genuinely promotes deep learning and long-term engagement or merely encourages compliance (Ryan & Deci, 2020). This moves beyond simply identifying the presence of motivation to understanding its underlying nature and sustainability within digital environments. The review suggests that future theoretical work should further explore how specific digital learning platform features differentially impact the internalization continuum of extrinsic motivation, moving learners towards more self-determined forms (Chiu et al., 2023; Salikhova et al., 2020). 

Keller’s ARCS Model, while providing practical strategies, also finds renewed relevance in the digital age. The review demonstrates that the concrete strategies outlined in ARCS can be directly translated into specific features and pedagogical approaches within digital learning platforms. For instance, implementing varied multimedia content and gamified elements addresses “Attention”, while clear objectives and adaptive challenges build “Confidence”. The challenges observed in fostering confidence, specifically in asynchronous online environments, may require adaptation or novel strategies in fully digital contexts. This calls for theoretical extensions for ARCS to explicitly address the unique affordances and constraints of digital interactivity and learner isolation.

The bidirectional and dynamic relationship observed between motivation and digital learning environments also extends theoretical understanding. It highlights that motivational outcomes are not solely a product of platform design but are significantly co-constructed by the learner’s pre-existing motivational profiles (e.g., self-efficacy, intrinsic/extrinsic orientation) and external life circumstances (“lifeload”) (Walker et al., 2024). This suggests a need for theoretical models that integrate individual differences and contextual factors more explicitly when predicting motivational responses to digital interventions. Future theoretical developments could explore adaptive motivational frameworks that account for these dynamic interactions, moving beyond static models to embrace the complexity of real-world digital learning experiences (Chiu et al., 2023; Salikhova et al., 2020). 

5.3. Pedagogical Implications

The findings underscore the imperative for educators to adopt learner-centric pedagogical approaches when integrating digital learning platforms. To enhance intrinsic motivation, instructors should prioritize the design of activities that offer genuine choices, fostering student autonomy. This could include allowing students to select project topics, choose submission formats, or set flexible deadlines within a structured framework. Providing timely, specific, and constructive feedback is paramount for building competence, as it allows students to understand their progress and areas for improvement (Alamri et al., 2020). Digital learning platforms with robust feedback mechanisms and analytics tools can facilitate this process significantly. 

To cultivate relatedness, teachers must design for community. Simply posting content is not enough; educators should facilitate collaboration and social interaction. This can include structured group projects in the platforms, active discussion forums, or peer-review activities. Maintaining a strong instructor presence is also vital: for example, sending personalized messages or holding regular virtual office hours helps students feel seen and supported. Farrell and Brunton emphasize that an “engaging online teacher” and a sense of community were among the most important motivators for students. Even small acts, like addressing learners by name, responding promptly to posts, or arranging informal video meet-ups, can significantly strengthen students’ connection to the class.  

Regarding extrinsic motivation, educators should exercise caution to avoid the “overjustification effect” (López-Navarro et al., 2023). While external rewards can be useful for initial engagement or for tasks where intrinsic interest is low, they should be strategically designed to align with and eventually support intrinsic goals. For example, gamified elements should emphasize mastery and skill development rather than merely points or badges, ensuring that the “game” serves the “learning”. The weighting of such activities in overall grades should also be carefully considered to ensure they genuinely motivate without becoming a perfunctory exercise. Recognizing that foundational usability is crucial, educators should also advocate for and utilize digital learning platforms that are intuitive and easy to navigate, minimizing technical barriers that can demotivate students from the outset.

5.4. Design Implications 

For digital learning platform developers and instructional designers, the review highlights critical considerations for creating truly motivating environments. Platform design should inherently support the basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness (Chiu et al., 2023). This translates into:

• Autonomy Support: Include features that give students meaningful choice. Examples are customizable dashboards, multiple pathways through content (e.g., let students pick topics in sequence), and tools to set personal goals or track progress. Offering different learning media (videos, interactive simulations, readings) lets learners approach the material in the way that suits them best. 
• Competence Support: Build in clear progress visualizations and responsive feedback. For instance, allow instructors to give immediate, automated, or AI-generated feedback on quizzes. Include mastery indicators (levels, progress bars) so students see how they are improving. Adaptive learning engines can adjust difficulty: if a learner masters one concept quickly, the system can raise the challenge, whereas struggling learners get extra practice. Research shows students appreciate this – one study found that regular online practice not only raised self-efficacy but also helped students “feel competent”, especially when graded in a meaningful way (Odabaş & Kahramanoğlu, 2023).
• Relatedness Support: Provide rich communication and collaboration tools. Good platform design goes beyond simple forums: it might include integrated group workspaces, virtual breakout rooms for peer collaboration, and easy ways to give and receive peer feedback. Wherever possible, make student profiles visible and encourage introductions or icebreakers. For example, a “get-to-know” discussion forum or a virtual lounge area can foster community. Importantly, ensure there are straightforward channels for instructor-student interaction (e.g., messaging, video conferences), since teacher presence is a powerful motivator (Farrell & Brunton). 

Furthermore, designers should leverage the ARCS model’s principles. To capture and maintain Attention, platforms should enable the integration of diverse, engaging multimedia content and offer varied instructional approaches. For Relevance, features that allow for the contextualization of content with real-world examples or career applications are valuable. Building Confidence requires transparent communication of learning objectives and assessment criteria, alongside opportunities for low-stakes practice and mastery. Finally, ensuring Satisfaction involves providing both intrinsic reinforcement (e.g., through engaging content design) and appropriate extrinsic rewards (e.g., digital badges that signify meaningful achievement, not just arbitrary points). The design of gamified elements should be carefully considered to ensure they complement intrinsic motivation rather than undermining it, focusing on skill mastery and meaningful challenges (Jose et al., 2024). 

Finally, usability and user experience must be a top priority. As Khalil et al. (2020) found, Saudi medical students appreciated the convenience of online classes but reported “methodological, content perception, technical” challenges that threatened their motivation. To avoid this, designers should ensure the interface is intuitive (minimizing clicks to key actions), the platform is stable (load-tested, responsive), and ample support/help is available (FAQs, tutorials, live chat). A responsive mobile design is often crucial, since many students use phones for learning. By eliminating barriers at the entry level, designers create the conditions for all other motivational strategies to work. 

6. Conclusion and Recommendations for Future Research

6.1. Conclusion

This structured literature review demonstrates that digital learning platforms (DLPs) hold significant potential for enhancing both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among undergraduate students in higher education, yet their effectiveness is highly contingent on thoughtful design and pedagogical implementation. DLPs can foster intrinsic motivation by supporting students’ fundamental psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, aligning with Self-Determination Theory. Features promoting choice, providing clear pathways to mastery, and facilitating meaningful social interactions are crucial for nurturing this internal drive. Simultaneously, DLPs can leverage extrinsic motivators through elements like gamification, but their application requires careful consideration to avoid undermining intrinsic motivation through phenomena like the overjustification effect. The quality and alignment of extrinsic rewards with intrinsic goals are paramount for sustained, meaningful engagement.

The review also highlights that motivational dynamics in digital learning are complex and context-dependent. Online learning environments, while offering flexibility, present unique challenges such as potential isolation and digital distractions, which can negatively impact motivation. Student characteristics, including self-efficacy and external life pressures, significantly interact with platform design to shape motivational outcomes. Ultimately, the successful integration of DLPs for motivational enhancement necessitates a holistic approach that prioritizes foundational usability, learner-centric design, robust teacher support, and a deep understanding of how motivational theories translate into effective digital learning experiences.

6.2. Recommendations for Future Research

Based on the findings and identified limitations, the following recommendations for future research are proposed:

• Longitudinal and Experimental Studies: Future research should increasingly adopt longitudinal and experimental designs to establish clearer causal relationships between specific DLP features, pedagogical interventions, and changes in intrinsic and extrinsic motivation over time. This would provide a more robust understanding of sustained motivational impacts beyond short-term effects. 
• Nuanced Examination of Extrinsic Motivation: More studies are needed to differentiate between the various subtypes of extrinsic motivation (e.g., external, introjected, identified, integrated regulation) within digital learning contexts. This would allow for a more precise understanding of how specific DLP features influence the quality of extrinsic motivation and its potential for internalization.
• Impact of AI and Advanced Features: As AI-powered tools become more prevalent in DLPs, future research should specifically investigate how features like AI assistants, adaptive learning algorithms, and personalized content recommendations impact intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and whether these technologies genuinely foster deeper learning or merely enhance efficiency.
• Moderating Role of Individual Differences and Context: Research should further explore how individual student characteristics (e.g., learning preferences, personality traits, prior digital literacy, self-efficacy) and external contextual factors (e.g., “lifeload”, socio-economic status, institutional support structures) moderate the relationship between DLP usage and student motivation. This would inform the development of more adaptive and personalized digital learning solutions. 
• Comparative Studies Across Learning Environments: While some comparisons exist, more rigorous comparative studies are needed to systematically analyze motivational differences and effective strategies across fully online, hybrid, and face-to-face learning environments, particularly focusing on how to mitigate motivational challenges specific to digital settings.
• Usability and Motivational Impact: Future research could explicitly investigate the direct link between DLP usability (ease of use, intuitive interface) and its foundational impact on student motivation, quantifying how poor usability can act as a demotivating factor regardless of other motivational design elements. 

7. Final Thoughts

Digital learning platforms are not merely technological tools but dynamic environments that profoundly shape the educational experience. Their capacity to foster student motivation, both intrinsic and extrinsic, is a critical determinant of academic success and the cultivation of lifelong learners. By continuously refining our understanding of the intricate interplay between technology, pedagogy, and human motivation, the educational community can unlock the full potential of digital learning to create truly engaging, effective, and empowering learning journeys for undergraduate students.

References

Abdulrahim, H., & Mabrouk, F. (2020). COVID-19 and the digital transformation of Saudi higher education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 291-306.

Abildina, S., Sardarova, Z., Ozgambayeva, R., Janzakova, S., Kalykbayeva, A., Bitikova, A., & Abdol, E. (2023). The effect of variables associated with the digital learning environment on students’ motivation and attitudes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 11(6), 1497-1517. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3781 

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863-875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180 

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 

Al-Hail, M, Zguir, M. F., & Koç, M. (2024). Exploring digital learning opportunities and challenges in higher education institutes: Stakeholder analysis on the use of social media for effective sustainability of learning-teaching-assessment in a university setting in Qatar. Sustainability, 16(15), 6413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156413 

Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5261-5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y 

Alamri, H. Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322-352.

Ali, S. (2021). E-learners’ self-efficacy for online courses: Self-efficacy for IT use as a predictor for academic self-efficacy. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 7(2), 87-104. 

Alsoud, A. R., & Harasis, A. A. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on student’s e-learning experience in Jordan. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1404-1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050079 

An, F., Yu, J., & Xi, L. (2022). Relationship between perceived teacher support and learning engagement among adolescents: Mediation role of technology acceptance and learning motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992464 

Anderman, E. M. (2023). Extrinsic rewards undermine motivation in the classroom… sometimes. In Mimi Bong, Johnmarshall Reeve, and Sung-il Kim (eds), Motivation Science: Controversies and Insights, 149-153. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197662359.003.0025 

Balci, S., Secaur, J. M., & Morris, B. J. (2022). Comparing the effectiveness of badges and leaderboards on academic performance and motivation of students in fully versus partially gamified online physics classes. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8669-8704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10983-z 

Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions – A literature review. SAGE Open, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777 

Basch, J. M., Albus, P., & Seufert, T. (2025). Fighting Zoom fatigue: Evidence-based approaches in university online education. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 7091. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90973-6 

Blackmon, S. J., & Major, C. H. (2012). Student experiences in online courses: A qualitative research synthesis. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(2), 77-85.

Bosch, E., & Spinath, B. (2023). Students’ motivation in an online and a face-to-face semester. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 231(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000519 

Bright, K., & Vogler, J. S. (2024). Learning online vs. learning in person: A mixed-methods approach to understanding how student preferences and perceptions have evolved since the pandemic. Online Learning Journal, 28(4), 56-78. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i4.4565 

Bundy, J. (2022). Blackboard, Canvas, and Learning Management Systems. In M. Ramlatchan (Ed.), Instructional Systems Design and the Diffusion and Adoption of Technology (Vol. 1). Kindle Direct Publishing. 

Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661 

Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54, S14-S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998 

Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044 

Chon, V. b. F. A., Sharif, S. b, & Saleh, N. b. M. (2024). Gamification for enhancing students’ learning motivation: A systematic review. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 10(2), 19-41.

Clark, E., Davis, O., & Al-Jabri, S. (2025). The impact of using online learning platforms on student learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Narrative, 3(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijen.v2i4.12663 

Dahlstrøm, C. (2017). Impacts of gamification on intrinsic motivation. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 

Deci, E. L., & Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627  

Devkota, B., & Giri, S. (2020). Student motivation for academic performance in higher education in Nepal. Education and Development, 30(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3126/ed.v30i1.49401 

Dong, W., Xiang, C. Kamaruddin, A. Y., Ali, S. K. S., Yang, Z., & Wang, X. (2024). The relationship between perceived teacher relatedness-support behavior (RSB) and learning motivation of dancesport students in universities. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 28043. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79507-8 

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018 

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5 

Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x 

Gorshenin, A. (2018). Toward modern educational IT-ecosystems: From learning management systems to digital platforms. International Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 55-68.

Güçlü, M., Draganović, S., & Elen, M. A. (2024). Online learning self-efficacy beliefs predict subjective well-being of college students during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 7(3), 334-345. 

Hartnett, M. (2016). Motivation in online education. Springer. 

Hashmi, Z. F., Iqbal, J., Asghar, M. Z., Siming, L. (2025). The influence of online learning interactions on self-regulated learning: Mediating role of technology proficiencies among higher education students. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2025.2492657 

Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002 

Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilizing learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1961-1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z 

Jose, B., Cherian, J., Jaya, P. J., Kuriakose, L., & Leema, P. W. R. (2024). The ghost effect: How gamification can hinder genuine learning. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1474733 

Kasabova, G., Parusheva, S., & Bankov, B. (2023). Learning management systems as a tool for learning in higher education. Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists – Varna. Economic Sciences Series, 12(2), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.56065/IJUSV-ESS/2023.12.2.224 

Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer. 

Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278 

Khalil, R., Mansour, A.E., Fadda, W.A. et al. (2020). The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students’ perspectives. BMC Medical Education, 20, Article 285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02208-z 

Leek, J., & Rojek, M. (2022). Functions of digital learning within the international mobility programme – perspective of university students and staff from Europe. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 6105-6123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10855-y 

Li, K., & Keller, J. M. (2018). Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review. Computers & Education, 122, 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.019 

Liu, Y., Ma, S., & Chen, Y. (2024). The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1357936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357936 

López-Navarro, E., Giorgetti, D., Isern-Mas, C., & Barone, P. (2023). Gamification improves extrinsic but not intrinsic motivation to learning in undergraduate students: a counterbalanced study. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 16(1), 1-18.

Lopez, R. M., & Tadros, E. (2023). Motivational factors for undergraduate students during COVID-19 remote learning. Family Journal (Alexandria, Va.), 10664807231163245. https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231163245 

Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121-131. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0033546 

Nicholson, S. (2012). A user-centered theoretical framework for meaningful gamification. In C. Martin, A. Ochsner & K. Squire (Eds.), Games+Learning+Society 8.0 Conference, Madison, WI, June 13-15 (pp. 223-229). Carnegie Mellon University, ECT Press

Odabaş, C., & Kahramanoğlu. R. (2023). Qualitative analysis of the relationship between online homework and prior success, self-efficacy, perceived responsibility, motivation and academic success. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 7(2), 619-639.

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Peng, R. Z., Fu, R. R. (2021). The effect of Chinese EFL students’ learning motivation on learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6235 

Qureshi, F., Khawaja, S., Sokić, K., Pejić Bach, M., & Meško, M. (2024). Exploring intrinsic motivation and mental well-being in private higher educational systems: A cross-sectional study. Systems, 12(8), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12080281 

Rajan, M. H., Herbert, C., & Polly, P. (2024). Disrupted student engagement and motivation: observations from online and face-to-face university learning environments. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1320822

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701.

Ratinho, E., & Martins, C. (2023). The role of gamified learning strategies in students’ motivation in high school and higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(8), e19033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19033 

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 

Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2021). Adult learners’ responses to online learning: A qualitative analysis grounded in Self-determination Theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(10), em2011. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11176 

Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2020). Psychological aspects of digital learning: A Self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep280. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584 

Swerzenski, J. D. (2021). Critically analyzing the online classroom: Blackboard, Moodle, Canvas, and the pedagogy they produce. Journal of Communication Pedagogy, 4, 51-69. DOI:10.31446/JCP.2021.1.05 

Syan, S. A. E., El swerky, F. M., Elshafie, W. H. K., Salama, N. S. S., Ayed, M. M. A., Abdelfatah, B. M. Y, & El-Ghadban, F. E.-S. (2021). Effect of blended learning and social media learning on the academic success and motivation among undergraduate nursing students. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 12(2), 1774-1786. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2021.238109 

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657 

Uçar, H., & Kumtepe, A. T. (2020). Effects of the ARCS-V-based motivational strategies on online learners’ academic performance, motivation, volition, and course interest. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12404 

Walker, A., Aguiar, N., Soicher, R., Kuo, Y., & Resig, J. (2024). Exploring the relationship between motivation and academic performance among online and blended learners: A meta-analytic review. Online Learning, 28(4), 76-116. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i4.4602 

Waller, L. G. (2021). Digital transformation for higher education post COVID-19. Research Outreach. Retrieved July 8, 2025, from https://researchoutreach.org/articles/digital-transformation-higher-education-post-covid-19/ 

Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Kee, Y. H., & Chian, L. K. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), e01983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983  

Weiler, T., & Murad, W. (2022). Motivational factors influencing learners’ academic success in an Australian enabling education setting. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 13(4), 97-119. 

Yuerong, L. Na. M., Xiaolu, Y., & Alam, S. S. (2024). Self-determination and perceived learning in online learning communities. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 24538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74878-4 

Zhou, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in distance education: A self-determination perspective. American Journal of Distance Education, 38(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2023.2177032 

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge.